The majority of rejected life or critical illness insurance claims occur because people withhold information at time of application. This article tells the true story of a person who fell foul of this common eventuality.
Life and Critical Illness Insurance - never withhold information as it will invalidate a claim.
Withholding information is the single most common cause of a life
- Life Insurance and Life Assurance are not the same!
- Life Insurance and Life Assurance are different. Most people assume they are one and the same product and their online searches reflect this. What are the differences and what are they used for? This article provides an explanation for the layman.
- Keyman Insurance. insures some of your biggest businesses risks.
- Keyman insurance is a necessary cost of a small business but it is often missed. The author explains why such an omission could be disastrous to your business.
- Critical Illness Insurance and Life Insurance Cover for Better and for Worse
- What does critical illness insurance do? This article explains.
- Life Insurance Providing Little Protection from Terrorism
- We sincerely hope that you are never caught up in a terrorist attack. But if you were would your insurance stand up for you ?
- Critical illness Insurance. Insurers under fire
- Critical Illness insurers are receiving some bad press. This article looks the reasons and comments.
- Insurance. Duplicated insurance wastes money.
- You'd be surprised how many of us inadvertently duplicate insurance cover - and it's a total waste of money. This article explains.
Mrs C had surgery to remove cancerous lymph nodes from her groin; while recovering from the operation, she fell ill with a secondary infection. At this difficult time, she received ( cheap mortgages ) some extra bad news. Her claim under her critical illness insurance policy had been rejected, and she could not expect to receive the £200,000 payout. To understand why her claim was rejected, we need to look at the background to these events.
• In June 2001, Mrs C discovered a patch of flaky skin on her back, and she went to the doctor thinking it was eczema. Her GP wasn't sure and referred her to a specialist dermatologist for an expert opinion. However, Mrs C cancelled the appointment with the dermatologist because the flaky skin cleared up before the date of the ( life insurance policies ) appointment. Mrs C thought no more about it, especially as the GP did not communicate any particular urgency to her about the matter.
• In August 2001, nine weeks after the GP appointment, Mrs C received a ( home insurance ) routine sales visit from her life insurance company, Standard Life. The sales representative reviewed her situation due to the fact she now had a young family, and recommended she purchase a £200,000 Critical Illness policy. Mrs C signed up to the new policy without hesitation.
• The sales representative went through the application form with Mrs C, filling in the answers for her as they progressed through the questions. When asked to provide details of incidences when she had been referred to a specialist for tests or treatments, Mrs C asked the sales representative what Standard Life meant by that. Mrs C alleges that the representative stated that only referrals relating to serious conditions needed to be mentioned. Since Mrs C's referral related to what she thought was eczema, she didn't believe it to be a serious condition, so she did not mention it and it did not go on the form. They completed the form together and Mrs C signed the form believing that she had provided all the information that Standard Life had asked for.
Several days later Mrs C's application was successful and she was issued with a Critical Illness Insurance policy for £200,000.
• Two years down the line, Mrs C was diagnosed with skin cancer. She had to undergo major surgery to try and remove the cancer. Mrs C made a claim on her critical illness insurance policy believing that she had a valid claim.
• Mrs C's claim was rejected, Standard Life cited "reckless non-disclosure" as the cause - the insurer's way of saying that Mrs C purposely withheld information about her referral to a dermatologist.
How did this happen?
It is clear by now that Mrs C should have mentioned the fact that she had been referred to a dermatologist - so why didn't she?
Two events brought about this unfortunate situation:
1. When Mrs C asked what kind of referrals needed to go on the form, the Standard Life sales representative told her that she only needed to mention serious conditions. This was completely wrong - the application form question stated "all occasions her GP had referred her for tests or treatments". The key words here are ALL OCCASIONS. ALL means ALL and there is no flexibility for an applicant to consider if the referral is worth mentioning or not. The sales representative provided Mrs C with the wrong advice.
2. Mrs C was not made aware by the GP that the flaky skin was potentially a serious matter. The GP later admitted that this was the case. If Mrs C did not realise that the referral was a potentially serious matter, then surely she cannot be said to have been withholding information when completing the application form. Remember, the sales representative told her that only serious conditions need to be mentioned.